Those who did not belong to his partyâ??tabled that.
Those who doubted the mechanics of his electionâ??ignored that.
Those who wondered of his qualificationsâ??forgot that.
History teaches us that nearly unanimous support of a government cannot be taken away from that government by its critics.
It can only be squandered by those who use it not to heal a nationâ??s wounds, but to take political advantage.
Terrorists did not come and steal our newly-regained sense of being American first, and political, fiftieth. Nor did the Democrats. Nor did the media. Nor did the people.
The Presidentâ??and those around himâ??did that.
They promised bi-partisanship, and then showed that to them, â??bi-partisanshipâ?� meant that their party would rule and the rest would have to follow, or be branded, with ever-escalating hysteria, as morally or intellectually confused; as appeasers; as those who, in the Vice Presidentâ??s words yesterday, â??validate the strategy of the terrorists.â?�
They promised protection, and then showed that to them â??protectionâ?� meant going to war against a despot whose hand they had once shaken, a despot who we now learn from our own Senate Intelligence Committee hated Al-Qaeda as much as we did.
The polite phrase for how so many of us were duped into supporting a war, on the false premise that it had â??something to doâ?? with 9/11, is â??lying by implication.â?�
The impolite phrase is: "impeachable offense."
Despite what ABC's mockumentary says, more Americans think 9/11 was Bush's fault than Clinton. Because, you know, Bush was in office, and had that whole presidential briefing thingamagiggy telling him about the planes and bin Laden and all that. Check it out.