Who do you believe? The people who told us the "deadenders" would be disheartened when Saddam's sons were killed? When Saddam himself was captured? When Iraqis voted on a constitution? When the U.S. killed Abu Musab al-Zarqawi? The people who have given us three reasons â?? weapons of mass destruction, links to terrorism, democratizing the Middle East â?? to date, for invading a country that never threatened us?
Or do you think maybe a bunch of scientists using accepted research methods just might be a little closer to the truth?