Which is stupid on many, many levels. No court should be telling a news organization what they can and can't broadcast. Worse still, no news organization should be paying the slightest attention to such an injuction in the first place. Ever heard of "prior restraint"? The Pentagon Papers ring a bell?
Then again, this was never really about journalism anyway; it was about hype. If Channel 6 had something they should have put it on the air, full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes. You either get sued, or you don't, after the fact. Instead the station hyped their big stash o' documents as the story, likely because they have no story. And now they are acting like whipped puppies when a judge tells them what they can and can't broadcast.
Journalism at its worst.
We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Orlando Weekly. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Orlando Weekly, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.
Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Support Local Journalism.
Join the Orlando Weekly Press Club
Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.
Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.
Join the Orlando Weekly Press Club for as little as $5 a month.