Which is stupid on many, many levels. No court should be telling a news organization what they can and can't broadcast. Worse still, no news organization should be paying the slightest attention to such an injuction in the first place. Ever heard of "prior restraint"? The Pentagon Papers ring a bell?
Then again, this was never really about journalism anyway; it was about hype. If Channel 6 had something they should have put it on the air, full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes. You either get sued, or you don't, after the fact. Instead the station hyped their big stash o' documents as the story, likely because they have no story. And now they are acting like whipped puppies when a judge tells them what they can and can't broadcast.
Journalism at its worst.
We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Orlando Weekly. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Orlando Weekly, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.
Email us at email@example.com.
Orlando Weekly works for you, and your support is essential.
Our small but mighty local team works tirelessly to bring you high-quality, uncensored news and cultural coverage of Central Florida.
Unlike many newspapers, ours is free – and we'd like to keep it that way, because we believe, now more than ever, everyone deserves access to accurate, independent coverage of their community.
Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing pledge, your support helps keep Orlando’s true free press free.