Media organizations sound the alert on Florida's attempt to undermine public-records law


Another gem from the 2016 state legislative session, which is fast becoming the most unDemocratic session we've witnessed in Tallahassee in years (see: proposal to make legal abortion a felony here, proposal to make open the door to fracking here and proposal to prevent counties from banning polystyrene products here): The state is now considering bills that would undermine transparency in government. 

The bills – HB 1021 and and SB 1220 – would change the language of the state's current public records law so that judges can decide whether or not to award attorney's fees to organizations that win lawsuits to obtain access to public records. Current state law says that when somebody – a media organization, a watchdog organization or even an individual – tries to obtain public records and a government agency refuses, the requester has two remedies: to ask an attorney to bring criminal charges or to take the government agency to court. If the requester wins the suit, current law states that the requester "shall" be awarded attorney's fees and court costs. These bills would change that language to say that a judge "may" award those fees.

This is a big deal because if this bill passes, judges also may not decide to award attorney's fees. Even if people win their suits. Most people who file legitimate public records requests – requests for documents that you have a right to review, as a citizen, by the way – don't have enough money to take a chance on whether they'll be forced to take a contested request to court. So, more than likely, anyone who isn't wealthy enough to take a chance that they could have to pay their own way, should a judge arbitrarily decide not to award them the fees they've accumulated through the court process, won't go the distance with these suits. Which means fewer suits are likely to be filed, and less information will be filtered out to the public. Can you say chilling effect?

The Association of Alternative Newsmedia (a trade industry that we belong to) recently posted its response to these bills. It has joined Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, the Associated Press, the Society for Professional Journalists and other organizations in urging Florida lawmakers to reject both bills. Read the letter the organizations sent to legislative leadership on Jan. 28. You can read the statement from the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies here. 


We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Orlando Weekly. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Orlando Weekly, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Orlando Weekly Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Orlando Weekly Press Club for as little as $5 a month.