New Florida bill would allow women to sue doctors 10 years after abortion

by

comment
As per usual, Florida Republicans have already filed a series of anti-abortion bills in the state legislature, including a measure that bans abortion 20 weeks after conception. But a new proposal sponsored by state Rep. Erin Grall brings an added twist to the debate. HB 19 would allow women to sue their doctors up to 10 years after undergoing an abortion.

The Vero Beach Republican's measure says physicians who perform abortions are liable to their female patients who are physically injured or experience "emotional distress" caused by their doctors' "negligence or failure to obtain the informed consent required."  The bill gives women 10 years to sue, but they must act within four years of the harm. HB 19 has already passed the Florida House Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee by a 10-6 vote.



"This bill is about empowering women to bring valid claims against negligent physicians and to look at what is the remedy for failure to give proper informed consent, which really is a very different way to look at what's happening and how some women are not being given a true picture of what the decision they are about to make could or would do to their future," Grall says, according to The News Service of Florida.

The Florida Planned Parenthood Alliance called the bill "a blatant attempt to intimidate and shutter safe and law-abiding abortion providers," on its Facebook page.  State Rep. Sean Shaw, D-Tampa, says the bill would have a "negative effect on a woman's ability to get the procedure."



"Not only will it have a chilling effect on her ability to find someone to do it, it also creates a cause of action for a specific procedure that is totally foreign to current law," Shaw says, according to NSF. "It would be something that we would be creating, it would be something new when, in fact, if we need to change the med-mal statute, then let's do that."

Other Republican lawmakers and lobbyists for the insurance and doctor industry also expressed concerns about the bill, NSF reports.

"A lot of the elements that are in the law that were criticized today were designed to bring that (malpractice system) under control," says Mark Delegal, a lobbyist for The Doctors Company, during a hearing for the bill. "I think this is bigger than the abortion issue. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a malpractice bill that indicts the current system. And I think that's pretty serious in light of the substantial progress we've made."

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Orlando Weekly. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Orlando Weekly, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at feedback@orlandoweekly.com.

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Orlando Weekly Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage in 2020, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going in 2021. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Join the Orlando Weekly Press Club for as little as $5 a month.